People v. Ault
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
In People v. Nesler (1997) 16 Cal.4th 561 [66 Cal.Rptr.2d 454, 941 P.2d 87] (Nesler), a plurality of this court concluded that when a criminal defendant appeals the denial of his or her motion for a new trial on grounds of juror misconduct, the appellate court must independently review, as a mixed question of law and fact, the trial court’s conclusion that no prejudice arose from the misconduct. (Id. at p. 582, fn. 5 (lead opn. of George, C. J.).) We granted review in this case to determine the proper standard of review when the trial court granted a criminal defendant’s…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. GamacheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. DykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. AlbarranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.