Legal Opinion

People v. Ault

California Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2004No. S119948PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

In People v. Nesler (1997) 16 Cal.4th 561 [66 Cal.Rptr.2d 454, 941 P.2d 87] (Nesler), a plurality of this court concluded that when a criminal defendant appeals the denial of his or her motion for a new trial on grounds of juror misconduct, the appellate court must independently review, as a mixed question of law and fact, the trial court’s conclusion that no prejudice arose from the misconduct. (Id. at p. 582, fn. 5 (lead opn. of George, C. J.).) We granted review in this case to determine the proper standard of review when the trial court granted a criminal defendant’s…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. GamacheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. DykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. AlbarranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API