Legal Opinion
French v. Town of Clinton
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 5, 1990No. 13777PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The principal issue in this condemnation case is the propriety of the trial court’s method of determining the value of property taken by eminent domain. The defendants, the town of Clinton and the Clinton water pollution control commission, filed a statement of compensation in the amount of $275,000 in connection with the taking, for the purpose of constructing a municipal water pollution control facility, of a parcel of property owned by the plaintiffs, Arthur L. French and Mario, Louise and Angelo Lupone. The defendants subsequently filed a return of notice, whereupon the clerk of the court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Volck v. MuzioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Moss v. New Haven Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Bennett v. New Haven Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Slavitt v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- City of Bristol v. Tilcon Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. BannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Alemany v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.