Legal Opinion
Alemany v. Commissioner of Transportation
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 26, 1990No. 13901PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The principal issue in this condemnation case is the availability of severance damages for the risk of losses that may arise from future use of a highway easement but which have not yet occurred at the time of the taking. The defendant, the commissioner of transportation, condemned an easement interest in a portion of the plaintiff’s land in connection with the widening of United States Route 7. The defendant assessed damages in the amount of $7200, and filed a notice of condemnation with the Superior Court. The plaintiff, Joseph A. Alemany, brought an appeal for reassessment of damages in…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Petriello v. KalmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Town of Winchester v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Andrews v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Stanley Works v. New Britain Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Powers v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Commissioner of Transportation v. Rocky Mountain, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Commissioner v. Towpath AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Commissioner of Transportation v. LarobinaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.