Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC Partnership
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
*815 Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The principal issue in these consolidated appeals and this cross appeal is whether, in the underlying condemnation proceeding, the trial court improperly excluded, as a matter of law, evidence and testimony regarding the environmental contamination and remediation costs associated with the condemned property. The plaintiffs, the Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. (Northeast), and the town of Windham (town),1 appeal2 from the judgment of the trial court, which reassessed the award of damages for the taking by eminent domain of the real property of the named defendant, ATC…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- City of Bristol v. Tilcon Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. AndaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Housing Authority v. Suydam Investors, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.