Legal Opinion
Bonds v. Heyman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 14, 1997No. Civil Action 95-0044 (RCL)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment, defendant’s motion to dismiss and for summary judgment, and plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent the defendant Smithsonian Institution from eliminating plaintiff Bonds’ position at the National Postal Museum. For the reasons stated below, plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment will be denied, as will defendant’s motion to dismiss and for summary judgment; plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction will be granted. 1
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Keeley v. SmallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Zirkle v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Bowie v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- DeNovellis v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Farris v. RiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.