Legal Opinion

Zirkle v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 2003No. 02-CV-310PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Todd Zirkle appeals from the denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction. In that motion, appellant sought to prevent his employer, the District of Columbia Office of Tax and Revenue (“OTR”), from terminating his employment pending the outcome of his suit brought under the District of Columbia Whistleblower Protection Act, D.C.Code §§ 1-615.51 et seq. (2001) (“WPA”). 1 We affirm the trial court’s denial of injunctive relief.

I

From February 2,1998, to September 5, 2001, appellant was employed as the Supervisor of Major Property Tax Assessments in OTR, an agency…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hansford P. Miller v. Jackson AviromCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  3. National Student Association, Inc. v. Lewis B. HersheyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. Veronice A. HOLT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the CONTINENTAL GROUP, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. Arcamuzi v. Continental Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Wilburn v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Ortberg v. Goldman Sachs GroupDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Williams v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  4. Williams v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. Freeman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API