Legal Opinion
Farris v. Rice
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 25, 2006No. Civil Action 05-1975 (RMU)PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for A Preliminary Injunction
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Currently before the court is the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction. The plaintiff, Virginia Farris, is a thirty-three year employee of the United States Foreign Service (the “defendant”), a branch of the United States Department of State. Farris, an Asian-American woman, brings this case alleging unlawful discrimi nation and retaliation. Specifically, she claims that the U.S. Foreign Service improperly failed to select her for certain positions within the agency…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- Mova Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Stanley v. University of Southern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Davis v. BillingtonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Ahuruonye v. U.S. Dep't of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Farris v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.