Legal Opinion

City of Livermore v. Baca

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 2012No. H034835PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUSHING, P. J.

Dennis E. Baca appeals a judgment entered in an action for eminent domain commenced by the City of Livermore. On appeal, Mr. Baca asserts the trial court erred in excluding all of his proffered evidence of permanent and temporary severance damages related to the takings during in limine motions. Mr. Baca argues the court’s exclusion of all of his evidence was tantamount to granting a nonsuit in favor of the City of Livermore. In addition, Mr. Baca claims the trial court erred in its definition of the project, including work by the State of California, which was not a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Amtower v. Photon Dynamics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kinda v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. San Diego Gas & Elec. Co. v. Schmidt CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Boxer v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Garner v. BNSF Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. Kennedy v. Sadafi CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API