Legal Opinion

City of Pawhuska v. Martin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 21, 1931No. 20317PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.

This is an action by William Martin, by Buler Martin, his mother and next friend, against the city of Pawhuska, to recover damages because of an alleged injury to his eyes.

The trial was to a jury and resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $500.

Defendant first contends that the court erred in overruling its motion for a directed verdict for the reason that plaintiff failed to establish primary negligence. The evidence discloses the facts to be about as follows : The plaintiff was a minor, eleven years of age. .The defendant owned and operated an electric…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dodson Williams v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Great Western Coal & Coke Co. v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Rhodes v. LamarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Planters' Cotton & Ginning Co. v. PennySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Midland Valley R. Co. v. KerseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Southwest Box Co. v. DampfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Danner v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Duke v. DukeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  4. Duncan Life & Accident Ass'n v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Atchison, T. S. F. R. Co. v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API