Rhodes v. Lamar
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BENNETT, C.
Francis C. Lamar, age 25, and by occupation a stenographer and clerk, sued R. E. L. Rhodes and P. C. Geiss-ler, physicians and surgeons, to recover damages upon the theory that they, while removing plaintiff’s tonsils, negligently per mitted a glass light globe to find its way into plaintiff’s lung by which he was gravely injured. The jury found against the defendants, and R. E. Rhodes alone appealed.. The-petition is in the usual form, alleging that plaintiff employed defendants, duly licensed physicians in Tulsa, to remove his tonsils ; that defendants placed plaintiff under an…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Dodson Williams v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
- Lotten v. O'BrienWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Great Western Coal & Coke Co. v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Spears Purifoy v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Middlebrook v. Imler, Tenny & Kugler, M.D.'s, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Cohn v. JC Penney Company, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1975
- Albina Engine & Machine Works, Inc. v. AbelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Bruner v. McCarthyUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Green Construction Co. v. LampeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.