Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Lamar

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 9, 1930No. 19112PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENNETT, C.

Francis C. Lamar, age 25, and by occupation a stenographer and clerk, sued R. E. L. Rhodes and P. C. Geiss-ler, physicians and surgeons, to recover damages upon the theory that they, while removing plaintiff’s tonsils, negligently per mitted a glass light globe to find its way into plaintiff’s lung by which he was gravely injured. The jury found against the defendants, and R. E. Rhodes alone appealed.. The-petition is in the usual form, alleging that plaintiff employed defendants, duly licensed physicians in Tulsa, to remove his tonsils ; that defendants placed plaintiff under an…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Dodson Williams v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Lotten v. O'BrienWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Great Western Coal & Coke Co. v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Spears Purifoy v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Middlebrook v. Imler, Tenny & Kugler, M.D.'s, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Cohn v. JC Penney Company, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Albina Engine & Machine Works, Inc. v. AbelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  4. Bruner v. McCarthyUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Green Construction Co. v. LampeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API