Legal Opinion

Smith v. Center Ford, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided November 8, 1999No. Civ.A. 4:98cv131PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court heard argument on the motion to dismiss on October 22, 1999. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion to dismiss is DENIED.

Factual and Procedural Background

Plaintiffs complaint alleges a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), because she was subject to: 1) sexual harassment; 2) a hostile work environment; and 3) retaliation for reporting incidents of sexual harassment.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Tinsley v. First Union National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  3. Bolinsky v. Carter MacHinery Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1999
  4. Flippo v. American Home Products Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
  5. Walker v. Electrolux Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Puryear v. County of RoanokeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  2. Puryear v. County Of RoanokeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  3. Morris v. Waste Management of Virginia, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
  4. McIntyre-Handy v. West Telemarketing Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API