Legal Opinion

Bolinsky v. Carter MacHinery Co., Inc.

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided October 14, 1999No. 2:99CV00047PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JONES, District Judge.

The question in this case is whether the plaintiffs charge of discrimination, filed with the EEOC, was sufficient to exhaust his state administrative remedies pursuant to a worksharing agreement between the EEOC and the state fair employment practices agency, even though the plaintiff did not specifically request that the state agency consider the charge and did not specifically cite a violation of state law. Based on a plain reading of the workshar-ing agreement, I hold that the state waived investigation of the plaintiffs charge and thus there was…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Adams v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Commercial Office Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  4. Bobbie Jean Green v. Los Angeles County Superintendent of Schools Los Angeles County Office of Education Los Angeles County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fowler v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  2. Puryear v. County of RoanokeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  3. Puryear v. County Of RoanokeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  4. Carter v. Arlington Public School SystemDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
  5. Seery v. Biogen, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API