Legal Opinion
Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 31, 2011No. 2010-1271PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
This is a trade case involving the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce’s”) practice of “zeroing” certain negative values when calculating duties in antidumping investigations and administrative reviews. Specifically, this case concerns Commerce’s use of zeroing in administrative reviews. Commerce has previously argued that the relevant statutory provision compels zeroing. This court has opined that the statutory text applicable to both investigations and administrative reviews — namely the term “exceeds” in 19 U.S.C. § 1677(35)(A) — is sufficiently ambiguous to defer to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Clark v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Corus Staal BV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- SKF USA Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Union Steel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Jtekt Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Grobest & I-Mei Industrial (Vietnam) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Union Steel v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Apex Frozen Foods Private Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.