Legal Opinion

Apex Frozen Foods Private Ltd. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 12, 2017No. 16-1789PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal the decision of the Court of International Trade (“CIT”) affirming the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) final results in the seventh administrative review of the anti-dumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from India. Apex Frozen Foods Private Ltd. v. United States (Apex I), 37 F.Supp.3d 1286, 1289 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2014); see also Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India, 78 Fed. Reg. 42, 492 (Dep’t Commerce July 16, 2013) (final administrative review). Using the “average-to-transaction” methodology with zeroing, Commerce…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Novosteel Sa v. United States, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of Usx Corporation (Now Known as United States Steel Llc)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  3. United States Steel Group--A Unit of Usx Corporation Ak Steel Corporation Bethlehem Steel Corporation Inland Steel Industries, Inc. Ltv Steel Company, Inc. And National Steel Corporation and Geneva Steel Gulf States Steel, Inc. Of Alabama Laclede Steel Company Wci Steel, Inc. And Sharon Steel Corporation v. The United States, and Kawasaki Steel Corporation Nkk Corporation Kobe Steel, Ltd. Nippon Steel Corporation Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. And Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd., and Usinas Siderurgicas De Minas Gerias, S.A., and Companhia Siderurgica Nacional, and Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., and Dofasco, Inc., and Uss-Posco Industries, and Ipsco, Inc., and Preussag Stahl Ag Klockner Stahl Gmbh Krupp-Hoesch Stahl Ag Friedrich Krupp Ag Hoesch-Krupp and Thyssen Stahl Ag and Stelco, Inc., and Hoogovens Groep Bv and N.V.W. (u.s.a.), Inc., and Usinor Sacilor and Sollac, and Algoma Steel Inc., and Sidmar N v. And Tradearbed, Inc., Kern-Liebers Usa, Inc., and Bethlehem Steel Corporation Ak Steel Corporation Inland Steel Industries, Inc. Ltv Steel Company, Inc. National Steel Corporation and United States Steel Group--A Unit of Usx Corporation, and Gulf States Steel, Inc. Of Alabama Wci Steel, Inc. And Sharon Steel Corporation v. The United States, and Kawasaki Steel Corporation Kobe Steel, Ltd. Nkk Corporation Nippon Steel Corporation Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. And Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd., and Usinas Siderurgicas De Minas Gerias, S.A., and Sidbec-Dosco, Inc., and Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. Pohang Coated Steel Co., Ltd. Pohang Steel Industries Co., Ltd. And Union Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Companhia Siderurgica Nacional, and Voest Alpine Stahl Ag, and Ilva, S.P.A., and Siderar S.A.I.C., the Successor of Propulsora Siderurgica S.A.I.C. And Aceros Parana, S.A.I.C., and Stelco, Inc., and Dofasco, Inc., and Sidmar N v. And Tradearbed, Inc., and Usinor Sacilor and Sollac, and Empresa Nacional Siderurgica, S.A. And Algoma Steel Inc., and Worthington Industries, Inc. Ilva Usa, Inc. And Krupp Steel Products, Inc. v. Thyssen Stahl Ag Thyssen Steel Detroit Co. Thyssen Inc. Preussag Stahl Ag Klockner Stahl Gmbh Friedrich Krupp Ag Hoesch-Krupp and Krupp-Hoesch Stahl Ag, Defendants/cross-Appellants, and Hoogovens Groep Bv and N.V.W. (u.s.a.), Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Eckstrom Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Union Steel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Mid Continent Steel & Wire v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  2. Shandong Rongxin Import & Export Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  3. Dillinger France S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  4. Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
  5. EregLi Demir Ve çElik Fabrikalari v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API