Legal Opinion
Union Steel v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided February 27, 2012No. Consol. 11-00083PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
This consolidated antidumping duty matter is before the court following remand to the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) requiring it to explain its “zeroing” practice. See Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand at 3 (Oct. 13, 2011) (Docket No. 49) (“Remand Results ”). The court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c) because it is reviewing a final antidumping duty determination and it reviews such determinations for substantial evidence and, as in this matter, to decide if the agency determination complies with the applicable law. 19 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Murray v. Schooner Charming BetsySupreme Court of the United States · 1804
- Newell Companies, Inc. v. Kenney Manufacturing Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Corus Staal BV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Timken Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Union Steel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Hung Vuong Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
- Goodluck India Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Grobest & I-Mei Indus. (Vietnam) Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.