SKF USA Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
These consolidated cases present the question whether the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) properly calculated the profit component of a constructed value determination under 19 U.S.C. § 1677b(e)(2)(A). In each of these two eases, the Court of International Trade sustained Commerce’s methodology. We hold that Commerce has failed to adequately explain why it has interpreted the phrase “foreign like product” differently in 19 U.S.C. §§ 1677b(a)(l) and 1677(e). We accordingly vacate the decisions of the Court of International Trade in FAG Kugelfischer v. United States, No.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- Pesquera Mares Australes Ltda. v. United States v. Coalition for Fair Atlantic Salmon TradeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Cs Wind Vietnam Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Union Steel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Skf USA Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.