Legal Opinion
Union Steel v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 16, 2013No. 2012-1248, 2012-1315PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACH, Circuit Judge.
In the decision now on appeal, the United States Court of International Trade affirmed the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) use of zeroing to determine antidumping duties in administrative reviews, even though Commerce no longer uses zeroing in investigations establishing antidumping orders. This court has twice considered whether such divergent practices constitute a reasonable construction of Commerce’s governing statute, both times remanding for Commerce to provide an explanation. In the case now on appeal, Commerce has provided such an ex planation. Union…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Clark v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Haggar Apparel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Albemarle Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Boomerang Tube LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Apex Frozen Foods Private Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Jbf Rak LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Apex Frozen Foods Private Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.