Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance v. Belezos
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 10, 1990No. 89-837-REPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REDDEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) brings this action seeking a declaration that it is not required to defend or indemnify defendant Rosemary Belezos in an action pending in a Circuit Court of the State of Oregon (State Court). Plaintiff and defendants Rosemary and Thomas Belezos have filed cross motions for summary judgment. I grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and deny defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
A) State Court Action
The Lovejoy Specialty Hospital, Inc. (Lo-vejoy), a Portland Oregon hospital at which abortions are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. FreyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Isenhart v. General Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Snyder v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Larsen Oil Co. v. Federated Service InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1994
- Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Lexington InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009