Legal Opinion

Isenhart v. General Casualty Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1962PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action to recover damages for the alleged breach of a contract of insurance. Plaintiff is the insured under a policy of insurance issued by defendant. The alleged breach consisted of defendant’s refusal to defend a prior action brought by a third person against plaintiff for assault and battery. Plaintiff seeks to recover the amount expended by him in defending the prior action. Defendant demurred to the complaint on grounds which will be explained later. The demurrer was sustained and, plaintiff electing not to plead over, the trial court dismissed the case. Plaintiff appeals.

Plain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burt v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Malanga v. Manufacturers Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  3. Blohm v. Glens Falls InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Taylor v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  5. MacDonald v. United Pacific InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Ledford v. GutoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ferguson v. Birmingham Fire Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Dixon Distributing Co. v. Hanover InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Harasyn v. Normandy Metals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API