Legal Opinion
Larsen Oil Co. v. Federated Service Insurance
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 21, 1994No. Civ. 93-1098-JOPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT E. JONES, Judge:
This disposition resolves cross-motions for summary judgment on whether defendant Federated Services Insurance Company (Federated) had a duty to defend plaintiff Larsen Oil Company (Larsen) in an underlying action. Larsen claims the duty to defend arose when Carson Oil Company and Columbia Heating & Cooling, Inc., defendants in the underlying action, filed third-party claims against Larsen for contribution and indemnification. Bernice R. Lynch v. Carson Oil Company, Inc., Columbia Heating & Cooling, Inc., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs v. Larsen…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Michelle Lindahl v. Air France, a French CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Niagara County v. Utica Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., and Tocco, Inc. v. The Home Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Transamerica Insurance v. SunnesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Great Northern Insurance v. Benjamin Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- West American Insurance v. Band & DesenbergDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
- Rli Ins. Co. v. City of VisaliaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Charles E. Thomas Co. v. Transamerica Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- City of Englewood v. Commercial Union Assurance CompaniesColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.