Legal Opinion
Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Lexington Insurance
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided December 28, 2009No. 6:08-cr-06260PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
MICHAEL A. TELESCA, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, (“Bausch & Lomb” or “B & L”) brings this action against defendant Lexington Insurance Company (“Lexington”) seeking a declaration that Lexington is obligated to provide insurance coverage to Bausch & Lomb with respect to claims made against B & L by consumers for alleged injuries arising out of the use of Bausch & Lomb contact lens solutions. Bausch & Lomb claims that it purchased umbrella liability insurance policies (“the Lexington policies”) from the defendant for yearly periods from…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Breed v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WesolowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Arthur A. Johnson Corp. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mt. McKinley Insurance v. Corning Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2010