Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Nelson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1977No. 397-214, SC 24697PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is a garnishment proceeding. Plaintiff, judgment creditor of defendant Nelson, sought to garnish the proceeds of an automobile liability insurance policy issued to Nelson by Leatherby Insurance Company (garnishee). Garnishee answered that it had no proceeds which were owing under the policy. After filing allegations and interrogatories which garnishee answered, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. The motion was granted by the trial court, but because of the limited extent of the relief granted, plaintiff appeals. Garnishee cross-appeals, contending that a question of fact…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Birmingham Fire Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Isenhart v. General Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Forest Grove Brick Works, Inc. v. StricklandOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WolbarstSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948
  5. Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Ledford v. GutoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. United States National Bank v. BogeOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Nielsen v. St. Paul CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, ETC. v. Mission Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. WertzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API