Legal Opinion

Beecroft v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 16, 1994No. 93SC357PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice ERICKSON delivered the Opinion of the Court.

We granted certiorari to review People v. Beecroft, 862 P.2d 973 (Colo.App.1993), which held that a suspended sentence conditioned on drug treatment in a Cenikor facility does not constitute “confinement” for purposes of section 16-11-306, 8A C.R.S. (1986). 1 As a result of this holding, the court of appeals concluded that the defendant, Karl Beecroft, is not entitled to confinement credit for the time he spent at Cenikor. 2 We agree with the court of appeals and accordingly affirm.

I

On September 9, 1990, Beecroft was charged with one count…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Schubert v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Maus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. People v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  5. State v. ReynoldsArizona Supreme Court · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. LacalloColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Davenport v. Community Corrections of the Pikes Peak Region, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. People v. McGrawColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Edwards v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  5. Fierro v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API