Legal Opinion

Estey v. Dempsey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1985No. 51612-0, 51639-1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Recall charges were filed against three directors of West Valley School District No. 363. The trial court found the charges — all related to the school board's refusal to renew the superintendent's contract and issues arising from that controversy — insufficient to support recall. We agree and affirm the trial court.

The action which appears to have precipitated the cry for recall occurred on January 28, 1985, at a regular board meeting of the West Valley School Board. At that meeting, the Board by a 3 to 2 vote decided to not renew the employment contract of Superintendent Orville Gardner.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chandler v. OttoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Cole v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Cudihee v. PhelpsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Mead School District No. 354 v. Mead Education Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Bocek v. BayleyWashington Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re the Recall of WadeWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Loeffelholz v. Citizens for Leaders With Ethics & Accountability NowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Greco v. ParsonsWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re ZufeltWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re DeBruynWashington Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API