Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Otto

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1984No. 50885-2, 50886-1, 50887-9, 50888-7PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

This case involves a recall petition filed against members of the Moses Lake City Council. The issue presented is whether the charges propounded in the petition allege sufficient grounds for recall. The trial court, pursuant to RCW 29.82.010, as amended by Laws of 1984, ch. 170, conducted a hearing to determine the sufficiency of the charges and adequacy of the ballot synopsis and concluded that the charges were sufficient. We hold that the recall charges were legally insufficient to serve as the basis for a recall election. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the trial court.

The salient…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strenge v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Janovich v. HerronWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Cudihee v. PhelpsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Amberg v. WelshMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Bocek v. BayleyWashington Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. In re the Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Matter of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cole v. WebsterWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Teaford v. HowardWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In Re the Recall of WadeWashington Supreme Court · 1990

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API