Legal Opinion

Cole v. Webster

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1984No. 50917-4PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

This case involves a recall petition filed against members of the Shoreline School Board. The issue presented is whether the charges propounded in the petition allege sufficient grounds for recall. The trial court, pursuant to RCW 29.82, as amended by Laws of 1984, ch. 170, conducted a hearing to determine the sufficiency of the charges and adequacy of the ballot synopsis and concluded that charges 1, 2, 4 and 5 were sufficient. We hold that charges 1 and 2 are legally insufficient, charges 4 and 5 are factually insufficient and the trial judge should have allowed voir dire examination of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Chandler v. OttoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Ledgering v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State ex rel. Mandatory Bussing v. BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Herron v. Tribune Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In re the Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Matter of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Teaford v. HowardWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In Re Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API