Legal Opinion

In Re the Recall of Wade

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1990No. 57419-7PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

Several members of an organization called Concerned About Richland Education appeal from an order which found the charges made in a recall petition against Richland School Board members James Wade, Chris Mathieu, Judy Golberg, and Dave Watrous were not legally and factually sufficient to support a recall.

In July 1990, appellants filed a recall petition in Benton County which charged respondents with misfeasance, malfeasance, and violations of their oaths of office. Appellants first alleged that at the end of the 1989/1990 school year, the Richland School District solicited applications for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chandler v. OttoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Teaford v. HowardWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Greco v. ParsonsWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re ZufeltWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Estey v. DempseyWashington Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. In re the Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Matter of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In re the Recall of AckersonWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In re the Recall of EastWashington Supreme Court · 2001

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API