Legal Opinion

Mortensen v. Fairbanks

California Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1934No. L. A. 14697PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Judgment went for the plaintiff in this action to recover damages for personal injuries incurred as the result of a collision of automobiles at a five-point intersection of thoroughfares in the city of Los Angeles. The defendants have appealed.

There is evidence from which the jury might have reasonably concluded that plaintiff first entered the intersee tion at a proper rate of speed and that the defendant, Cornelia Fairbanks, a minor, had entered the intersection at an excessive rate of speed and without otherwise exercising that degree of care essential to the proper operation of an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoff v. Los Angeles Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  2. McPhee v. LavinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Tousley v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Carnahan v. Motor Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. McLaughlin v. Los Angeles Ry. Corp.California Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Van Fleet v. HeylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Southwestern Freight Lines, Ltd. v. FloydArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Emery v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Burkhart v. CornNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Alward v. PaolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API