Legal Opinion

Tousley v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1913No. L.A. No. 3222PublishedCited by 34 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. W. McKinley, Frank Karr, R. C. Gortner, and W. W. Webster, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

Plaintiff obtained judgment against defendant for two thousand five hundred dollars, in an action brought by her to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received through the negligence of defendant. We have here an appeal by defendant from such judgment, and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

The injuries suffered by plaintiff were received in a collision between an automobile in which she was riding as a guest of its owner and a two-car interurban train of defendant running from the city of Long Beach to the city of Los Angeles. The accident occurred about…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Bresee v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. O'Neill v. Thomas Day Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Emerson v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Edwards v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Griffin v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Lawrence v. GoodwillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API