McLaughlin v. Los Angeles Ry. Corp.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and Norman S. Sterry for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in the sum of $750, entered in favor of the plaintiffs, who sued as the children and sole heirs of Mrs. Adelia Ackerson, to recover damages for _ her death, which was alleged to -have been caused by the negligence of the defendant in the operation of two street-cars on East Seventh Street, in the city of Los Angeles. The action was tried by the court without a jury.
The undisputed facts are these: Mrs. Ackerson started to cross from the south to the north side of East Seventh Street at a point between San Julian and Wall Streets at about 6…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. CreeksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Peck v. PierceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Jacques v. Bridgeport Horse RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
- Wise v. WakefieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Rapson v. LeightonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. HolmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. AbairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Parlier Fruit Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Barger v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Mortensen v. FairbanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.