Legal Opinion
Emery v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 23, 1943No. Civ. No. 13990PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J. pro tem.
Plaintiffs appeal from a jugment for defendants in an action brought to recover damages for the death of Walter W. Emery, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial. The latter appeal must be dismissed, since such an order is not appealable. Plaintiffs are the widow and children of Walter W. Emery and the defendants are respectively the owner and the driver of a motor coach with which he collided on March 25, 1941. The injuries received by him in this accident caused his death. The ease was tried by a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of *458defendants. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Benjamin v. NoonanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Gallichotte v. California Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Varner v. SkovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Mitsuo Umemoto v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Cloud v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Newton v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Stickel v. DurfeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Pittman v. BoivenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.