Legal Opinion

Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Louis Grossman, J.

Motions Nos. 89, 90, 91 and 94 on the calendar of November 3, 1978 are consolidated for disposition.

The main motion (No. 94) in this class action instituted by plaintiff Jean Loretto, formerly the owner of residential premises located at 303 West 105th Street (ownership was recently transferred to a corporation wholly owned by plaintiff), seeks to test the constitutionality of section 828 of the Executive Law, which became effective on January 1, 1973. Defendant City of New York and the remaining defendants (Teleprompter) move by separate motions (Nos. 91…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fred F. French Investing Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Stewart v. StraussCity of New York Municipal Court · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Loretto v. Group W. CableAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API