Legal Opinion
Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 7, 1981PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Meyer, J.
A statute which requires a landlord to allow installa*131tion of cable television1 facilities upon his property for the use of his tenants or the tenants of other buildings or both is a valid exercise of the police power rather than a taking requiring compensation, notwithstanding that the statute permits the payment by the cable television company for such installation of such amount as the State Commission on Cable Television2 determines to be reasonable. The order of the Appellate Division should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff Loretto purchased the…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Corsello v. Verizon New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Gregory v. City of San Juan CapistranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Stone v. Omnicom Cable Television of Illinois, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.