Legal Opinion
Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 30, 1982No. 81-244PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
458 U.S. 419 (1982)
LORETTO
v.
TELEPROMPTER MANHATTAN CATV CORP. ET AL.
No. 81-244.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Argued March 30, 1982.
Decided June 30, 1982.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
Michael S. Gruen argued the cause and filed briefs for appellant.
Erwin N. Griswold argued the cause for appellees. With him on the brief for appellees Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. et al. was Michael Lesch. Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., and Leonard Koerner filed a brief for appellee City of New York.[*]
2Opinion of the Court · MarshallJustice Marshall
This case presents the question whether a minor but permanent physical occupation of an…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited45 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Property Reserve, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Joaquin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Wiese v. BecerraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. WasdenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018