Legal Opinion
Loretto v. Group W. Cable
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 1987PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— The motion of plaintiff Jean Loretto for reargument or for leave to appeal is denied in its entirety, without costs.
The cross motions of defendants Group W. Cable, Inc. and the City of New York and of intervenor State of New York for leave to appeal are granted to the extent of deeming their motions as ones for reargument which we grant, and upon reargument we adhere to our affirmance of the appealed order which denied plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees, but do so for the reasons stated hereinafter, without costs.
Reargument is granted in this matter to clarify the basis of our…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Louisiana Municipal Employees' Retirement System v. Cablevision Systems Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Fiala v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 2010