Legal Opinion

State v. Carr

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 31, 1993PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIPTON, Judge.

The state appeals by permission from the order of the Gibson County Circuit Court granting the defendant, Charles M. Carr 1 , pretrial diversion. The State contends that the trial court failed to apply the appropriate standard of review of the prosecutor’s refusal to allow diversion. The defendant responds that the trial court acted correctly because the prosecutor abused his discretion when he failed to focus upon the defendant’s amenability to correction as provided by State v. Hammersley, 650 S.W.2d 352 (Tenn.1983). This case highlights the limits placed upon courts in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. GrearTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  2. McCallen v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. HammersleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Railroad & Public Utilities CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Pace v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. CurryTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. PinkhamTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. WinsettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  4. State v. HoustonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  5. State v. LutryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API