State v. Winsett
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIRCH, Judge.
We granted an application filed by Jeremy A. Winsett, the petitioner, pursuant to Rule 10, Tenn.R.App.P., in order to review a judgment entered by Division VI, Criminal Court of Shelby County, upholding the district attorney general’s refusal to accept Winsett’s application for participation in the pretrial diversion program.
Because we find that the proceedings in this ease were not conducted in the manner required by statute 1 and pertinent law, we reverse the judgment and remand the cause for further proceedings as herein outlined.
I
The circumstances of the offense do not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. HammersleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HerronTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. CarrCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
- State v. MarkhamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- State v. WatkinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- State v. CurryTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. PinkhamTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. YanceyTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. LaneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- State v. LutryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.