McCallen v. City of Memphis
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARY R. WADE, Special Judge.
Permission to appeal to this court has been granted to the defendants, City of Memphis, Tennessee, the Memphis City Council, Sam P. Gay, Jr., Waymon H. Welch, Jr., and Homer B. Branan, III, under Rule 11 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. There are two issues:
1. Whether the proper method of review of a resolution of the Memphis City Council giving approval to a planned development is certiorari or declaratory judgment.
2. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in its application of the scope of review.
We initially hold that the action of the city…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Railroad & Public Utilities CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
- Fallin v. Knox County Board of CommissionersTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- Yokley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
- Boyce v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
- Episcopal Foundation of Jefferson County v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by229 opinions
- Flautt & Mann v. Council of City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
- 421 Corp. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Lafferty v. City of WinchesterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- City of Brentwood v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
- Davis v. Shelby County Sheriff's DepartmentTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
224 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.