State v. Curry
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Chief Justice.
We granted this appeal to determine whether the trial court properly ruled that the prosecution abused its discretion by failing to consider all of the relevant factors in denying the defendant’s application for pretrial diversion, and whether the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in remanding the case for an evidentiary hearing.1 The Court of Criminal Appeals agreed that the prosecutor’s written letter denying diversion did not discuss all of the relevant factors, but remanded for an evidentiary hearing to allow the prosecutor to testify as to the factors that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HammersleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. WashingtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. PinkhamTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. HerronTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. CarrCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- State v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. McKimTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. YanceyTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. LaneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.