Legal Opinion

State v. Pinkham

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1997PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRCH, Justice.

We granted the application for permission to appeal filed by Charles A. Pinkham, Jr., in order to determine the extent to which the district attorney general must disclose on the record the evidence relied upon to reject an application for pretrial diversion. 1

We find that the district attorney general has a duty to include in the record the factual basis and rationale for denying diversion. If, in petitioning the trial court for review of the diversion decision, the petitioner contests the facts upon which the district attorney general relied, then the trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HammersleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Pace v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. CarrCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  4. State v. WinsettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  5. State v. HoustonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. State v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. CurryTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. McKimTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. YanceyTennessee Supreme Court · 2002

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API