Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Forman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 8, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 3, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant was employed by a temporary employment agency and was assigned to work in a physical therapist’s office as an office assistant. Claimant expressed concern to the employment agency and the client that she was not qualified to fulfill some of the insurance and billing requirements that the job required, and claimant accepted the position…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of LutaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of HenriksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of ChiofaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Claim of Prince v. Commissioner of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Claim of Prince v. Commissioner of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. In re the Claim of Carolyn D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. In re the Claim of FalconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. In re the Claim of FalconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API