Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Rowe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 19, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*664Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 13, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant was employed as a personal care aide for the employer. Approximately one hour before her shift was to begin on December 28, 2002, claimant called her supervisor at home and left a message that she would not be reporting for work and then notified her workplace that she would be absent. This was contrary to the employer’s policy that an absence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of CranstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re the Claim of HenriksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FelderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of CapobiancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of HicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. In re the Claim of JacobsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API