Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Perez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 13, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*907Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 12, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Claimant was scheduled to take four days off from work, three as personal days and one as a sick day, between March 4, 2003 and March 7, 2003. He was not feeling well the following work day, March 10, 2003, and left a message on his employer’s answering machine indicating that he was ill. That day, he received a message from his employer…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of CranstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of ZakrzewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of HenriksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of CulpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of SgroiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of PregonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of JacobsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of AnthonyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008