Legal Opinion
In Re Salomon Smith Barney Mutual Fund Fees Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 26, 2006No. 04 CIV. 4055(PAC)PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
CROTTY, District Judge.
Inspired by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) and various state attorneys general investigations into the fee- and revenue-sharing in the mutual fund industry and subsequent settlement of these investigations, 1 Plaintiffs filed a 148-page Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (the “Complaint”), together with another 37 pages of exhibits, against Salomon Smith Barney (“SSB”). Plaintiffs, who are owners of some, but not all, of the mutual funds organized and offered by SSB,…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Operating Local 649 Annuity Trust Fund v. Smith Barney Fund Management LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Plumbers' Union Local No. 12 Pension Fund v. Nomura Asset Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- In re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- In Re Potash Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Youngers v. Virtus Investment Partners Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.