Legal Opinion
In Re Potash Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 3, 2009No. 08 C 6910. MDL No. 1996PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge.
This Multi-District Litigation (“MDL”) consists of two class actions. In the first action, Gage’s Fertilizer & Grain, Inc., Kraft Chemical Company, Minn-Chem., Inc., Shannon D. Flinn, Thomasville Feed & Seed,.Inc., and Westside Forestry Services, Inc. (collectively, the “Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs”) bring suit on behalf of themselves and all others who purchased potash products in the United States directly from Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. and PCS Sales (USA), Inc. (“PCS”), 1 Mosaic Company and Mosaic Crop Nutrition LLC…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Minn-Chem, Incorpora v. Agrium IncoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Nuance Communications, Inc. v. Abbyy Software HouseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- In Re Packaged Ice Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Luxottica Grp. S.P.A. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified On Schedule "A"District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
- Baldwin v. Star Scientific, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.