Legal Opinion

In re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust Litigation

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 30, 2009No. Civil Action No. 08-2433 (indirect)PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

The plaintiffs are a group of indirect purchasers of Wellbutrin XL, a once-a-day antidepressant, who are suing the producers of Wellbutrin XL, Biovail Corp., Biovail Laboratories, Biovail Laboratories International (together, “Biovail”), and its distributors, SmithKline Beecham Corp. and GlaxoS-mithKline PLC (together, “GSK”), for illegally conspiring to prevent generic versions of Wellbutrin XL, or buproprion hydrochloride, from entering the American market for that drug.

Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 572 Health and Welfare Fund (“Local 572”), IBEW-NECA…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. In re Niaspan Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. In Re Packaged Ice Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  4. Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. Glaxosmithkline, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Baldwin v. Star Scientific, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API