Legal Opinion

Bigelow v. Sanford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Gratiot. (Daboll, J.) Bill to quiet title to real estate. Complainant appeals from order sustaining demurrer. Keversed. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer, and dismissing complainant's bill.

The bill1 sets forth that complainant was the owner in fee of certain lands; that, confiding in the honor and integrity of her brother-in-law, Melvin Sanford, she, on November 4, 1883, being a widow, and without any person to assist her in the cultivation of said lands, conveyed the same in trust to said Sanford, he “covenanting and agreeing with your oratrix to cultivate the same, yielding to your oratrix a reasonable amount of usufruct, as the rents, issues, and profits thereof; that Sanford, “ either…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sweet v. ConverseMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Patton v. ChamberlainMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Seaman v. O'HaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Hubbard v. McNaughtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Harrington v. ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Red Star Motor Drivers' Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Thompson v. MarleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Kamman v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Macomber v. CottrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. School District No. 2 v. MusbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API