Legal Opinion

Patton v. Chamberlain

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1880PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court of Detroit. Judgment creditors’ bill. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

We have not been brought by the evidence in this case to the conclusion reached by the judge of the Superior Court. We are convinced that the testimony of Francis *6J. Chamberlain is truthful, and that it defeats the complainants’ case.

From this evidence it appears that, some twelve years or more ago Chamberlain’s first wife caused to be conveyed to him an eighty acre lot of land in St. Joseph county, which she had purchased with money received from her father, on a trust declared orally, that he would hold the same for their infant daughter, then six years of age or thereabouts. This the wife…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kingsbury v. BurnsideIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Cozine v. Graham & BleekerNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
  3. Whiting v. GouldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853
  4. McLaurie v. PartlowIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Maynard v. HoskinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1862

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kerschensteiner v. Northern Michigan Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Straw v. MowerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  3. Poppe v. PoppeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Renz v. StollMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Schumacher v. DraegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API