Harrington v. Scott
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari £0 two justices of the peace of the county of St. Clair, to remove proceedings had before them, for a forcible entry and detainer. The facts appe'ar in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the court,'
Whippe-e,- J.-
The transcript shows that the píairitiff below instituted proceedings' against Harrington and Young, under the forcible entry and detainer act. The complaint filed with the justice does not appear in the re-' turn, it having, as the parties state, been lost. Enough appears, however, to show that the proceedings were under the' provisions of the 1st,-2nd and 3rd secs, of chap. 5, tit. 3, part 3 Rev. Stat.- The form prescribed by statute for the warrant to be issued,- contemplates that the substance of the complaint should- be inserted therein! The warrant,among…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Pendill v. Union Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Marsh v. BristolMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Richter v. CordesMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Bigelow v. SanfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Van Auken v. MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.