Seaman v. O'Hara
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Calhoun Circuit.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
This suit was brought to recover a certain sum paid by plaintiff on a mortgage given by defendant and covering premises which defendant had afterwards sold to plaintiff. The deed which defendant gave the' plaintiff contained a covenant which plaintiff claimed made defendant liable to pay any sum owing upon the mortgage beyond a certain sum which was specified, while defendant, on the other hand, insisted that he conveyed subject to the payment by plaintiff of the whole mortgage. The plaintiff did in fact pay the whole, but then brought suit in assumpsit on the common counts to recover from…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Westchester Fire Insurance v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Insurance Co. of North America v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Phenix Insurance v. MungerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Sprague v. HosieMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.